|
|
Post by michael472 on Feb 23, 2010 7:41:15 GMT
E5
|
|
|
|
Post by altomarelatios on Feb 23, 2010 8:55:36 GMT
446
|
|
|
|
Post by michael472 on Feb 23, 2010 9:26:51 GMT
E7
|
|
|
|
Post by altomarelatios on Feb 23, 2010 11:08:31 GMT
448
|
|
|
|
Post by michael472 on Feb 24, 2010 3:56:40 GMT
^wrong number...I think...? f1
E9
|
|
|
|
Post by altomarelatios on Feb 24, 2010 4:37:58 GMT
what? how.... if my last one was wrong, then the one before that was wrong too, which it most likely isn't. unless your number is... what is your number....
|
|
|
|
Post by michael472 on Feb 24, 2010 5:38:57 GMT
what base are you counting in?
|
|
|
|
Post by altomarelatios on Feb 24, 2010 5:42:03 GMT
the regular base 10...
|
|
|
|
Post by michael472 on Feb 24, 2010 6:03:09 GMT
wouldn't your number have been 232 then?
|
|
|
|
Post by altomarelatios on Feb 24, 2010 6:20:00 GMT
I don't think so....
|
|
|
|
Post by Mangopie on Feb 24, 2010 7:54:54 GMT
but but but it's been base 7....446 was 230 in base 7. What's E9? If it's hexadecimal it's nowhere near 200..and 448 is some crazy hybrid of base 7 and 10. =S there hasn't even been 448 replies in this thread..
ETA: Whoops. I convinced myself hexadecimal was base 7 as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by michael472 on Feb 24, 2010 8:30:41 GMT
Hm...
Well...
should I correct myself to 1C1...
or stick with E9?
|
|
|
|
Post by altomarelatios on Feb 24, 2010 10:35:50 GMT
LOL, wait, now I'm confused, where exactly are we up to?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mangopie on Feb 26, 2010 6:01:12 GMT
Well, the smaller number...stick avec E9..which is 23310.
It's about time for a change in bases..
[hover=234 in base you-can-figure-out-what]1414[/hover]
|
|
|
|
Post by michael472 on Feb 26, 2010 7:07:04 GMT
K.
1420
|
|
